A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning future neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal web site inside a north Dublin suburb, a case that has captivated national consideration pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children home at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of preparing breaches, environmental fears, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Situations short article about René Collier as well as Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their loved ones house. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where advancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being made by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their arranging authorization by developing a wall past the boundaries in their site, leading to an encroachment with a Particular Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore spots are subject to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, notably in a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their setting up permission, and say the wall, which can be partially crafted, is in the right posture. Their authorized crew has characterised the action being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their perspective, an allegation that's been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal preparing disputes, wherever sights of the sea are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waist-significant h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods, a picture which includes because turn out to be emblematic of your depth of your dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain visual proof in the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site in the sea Irish Occasions described, describing how the two Adult men entered the drinking water for the duration of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm h2o to photograph the positioning became one of the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a region afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined in detail via the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read even further submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute during the lawful timeline.
At the Main from the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his evaluation of scheduling documents, maps, and disorders attached to your authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their motion is motivated by concern for environmental defense and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public look at, insisting in its place that it's about making certain that progress at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have described their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a couple merely trying to develop a family home in accordance with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Specific Spot of Conservation and say that each one operates happen to be completed based on Specialist advice and accredited ideas. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into the sea in the course of a storm, do not change the fundamental details.
The case has also raised broader questions about how arranging disputes René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over design of wall at coastal site is now a shorthand description for any scenario that a lot of observers see as progressively widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become far more contentious.
The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier pointed out which the businessman had Formerly been linked to community advocacy on organizing and environmental issues, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from very diverse Qualified backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are becoming synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site within the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waist-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions and René Collier waded through waistline-higher drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both the physical fact of the coastline and the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an abnormal solution.
As the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The court need to establish if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing situations. However the human element stays central: neighbours who should live along with one another prolonged after the authorized costs are already compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction performs at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, though the implications of the situation extend over and above that tackle. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. In addition it underscores how quickly an area disagreement can escalate when elementary challenges such as environmental protection and property legal rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre with the dispute stands partially built, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. Whether it will in the long run be altered, taken out, or completed as planned will rely on the court docket’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will likely continue on to look in headlines, linked indelibly to Among the most intently viewed preparing disputes in north Dublin lately.