A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning possible neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated countrywide attention adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly within a delicate coastal environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the correct place. Their legal crew has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waist-superior water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Periods, a picture which has because turn out to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations noted, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the h2o during intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Just about the most putting descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached on.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
On the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as made, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and problems attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have explained their long-standing link to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply seeking to create a relatives house in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Unique Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are already performed based on Specialist assistance and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include coming into The ocean all through a storm, do not alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above building of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental issues, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much solution.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and no matter if any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic difficulties like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.